Why are the stars, planets and moons round, when comets and asteroids aren’t?
This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
Jonti Horner, Professor (Astrophysics), University of Southern Queensland
When we look out at the solar system, we see objects of all sizes — from tiny grains of dust, to giant planets and the sun. A common theme among those objects is the big ones are (more or less) round, while the small ones are irregular. But why?
Gravity: the key to making big things round …
The answer to why the bigger objects are round boils down to the influence of gravity. An object's gravitational pull will always point towards the center of its mass. The bigger something is, the more massive it is, and the larger its gravitational pull.
For solid objects, that force is opposed by the strength of the object itself. For instance, the downward force you experience due to Earth's gravity doesn’t pull you into the center of the Earth. That's because the ground pushes back up at you; it has too much strength to let you sink through it.
However, Earth's strength has limits. Think of a great mountain, such as Mount Everest, getting larger and larger as the planet's plates push together. As Everest gets taller, its weight increases to the point at which it begins to sink. The extra weight will push the mountain down into Earth’s mantle, limiting how tall it can become.
Space is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
Expert Voices
Home News Science & Astronomy
I've always wondered: Why are the stars, planets and moons round, when comets and asteroids aren’t?
By Jonti Horner September 05, 2021
This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
Jonti Horner, Professor (Astrophysics), University of Southern Queensland
"I'm puzzled as to why the planets, stars and moons are all round (when) other large and small objects such as asteroids and meteorites are irregular shapes?"
— Lionel Young, age 74, Launceston, Tasm
This is a fantastic question Lionel, and a really good observation!
Sponsored Links
Moving to Australia to Study Might be Easier Than You Think
Online Study in Australia
When we look out at the solar system, we see objects of all sizes — from tiny grains of dust, to giant planets and the sun. A common theme among those objects is the big ones are (more or less) round, while the small ones are irregular. But why?
RECOMMENDED VIDEOS FOR YOU...
See the Earth and Stars Move in Time-Lapse from...
15/07/19See the Earth and Stars Move in Time-Lapse from Space
OTD in Space – January 7: Galileo Discovers 3...
07/01/18OTD in Space – January 7: Galileo Discovers 3 Moons of Jupiter
Stars From Space Station - Brilliant Views | Videovideo playing
James Webb Space Telescope testing has...
05/09/21James Webb Space Telescope testing has been completed
NOAA flew into Ida's eye and tracked it from space
04/09/21NOAA flew into Ida's eye and tracked it from space
Space Chat! What’s New In Space...
03/09/21Space Chat! What’s New In Space...
A variety of the Solar System’s small bodies, to scale. Bigger objects are round, but the small ones are anything but!
A variety of the solar system's small bodies, to scale. Bigger objects are round, but the small ones are anything but! (Image credit: Wikipedia/Antonio Ciccolella)
Gravity: the key to making big things round …
The answer to why the bigger objects are round boils down to the influence of gravity. An object's gravitational pull will always point towards the center of its mass. The bigger something is, the more massive it is, and the larger its gravitational pull.
For solid objects, that force is opposed by the strength of the object itself. For instance, the downward force you experience due to Earth's gravity doesn’t pull you into the center of the Earth. That's because the ground pushes back up at you; it has too much strength to let you sink through it.
However, Earth's strength has limits. Think of a great mountain, such as Mount Everest, getting larger and larger as the planet's plates push together. As Everest gets taller, its weight increases to the point at which it begins to sink. The extra weight will push the mountain down into Earth’s mantle, limiting how tall it can become.
If Earth were made entirely from ocean, Mount Everest would just sink down all the way to Earth's center (displacing any water it passed through). Any areas where the water was unusually high would sink, pulled down by Earth's gravity. Areas where the water was unusually low would be filled up by water displaced from elsewhere, with the result that this imaginary ocean Earth would become perfectly spherical.
But the thing is, gravity is actually surprisingly weak. An object must be really big before it can exert a strong enough gravitational pull to overcome the strength of the material from which it's made. Smaller solid objects (meters or kilometers in diameter) therefore have gravitational pulls that are too weak to pull them into a spherical shape.
This, incidentally, is why you don't have to worry about collapsing into a spherical shape under your own gravitational pull — your body is far too strong for the tiny gravitational pull it exerts to do that.
When an object is big enough that gravity wins — overcoming the strength of the material from which the object is made — it will tend to pull all the object’s material into a spherical shape. Bits of the object that are too high will be pulled down, displacing material beneath them, which will cause areas that are too low to push outward.
When that spherical shape is reached, we say the object is in "hydrostatic equilibrium." But how massive must an object be to achieve hydrostatic equilibrium? That depends on what it’s made of. An object made of just liquid water would manage it really easily, as it would essentially have no strength — as water's molecules move around quite easily.
Meanwhile, an object made of of pure iron would need to be much more massive for its gravity to overcome the inherent strength of the iron. In the solar system, the threshold diameter required for an icy object to become spherical is at least 400 kilometers — and for objects made primarily of stronger material, the threshold is even larger.
Saturn's moon Mimas, which looks like the Death Star, is spherical and has a diameter of 396 km. It’s currently the smallest object we know of that may meet the criterion.
But things get more complicated when you think about the fact that all objects tend to spin or tumble through space. If an object is spinning, locations at its equator (the point halfway between the two poles) effectively feel a slightly reduced gravitational pull compared to locations near the pole.
The result of this is the perfectly spherical shape you’d expect in hydrostatic equilibrium is shifted to what we call an "oblate spheroid" — where the object is wider at its equator than its poles. This is true for our spinning Earth, which has an equatorial diameter of 12,756 km and a pole-to-pole diameter of 12,712 km.
Tags :
Previous Story
- Samsung's Galaxy Watch 4 could be a peek...
- Galaxy S20 Ultra review: Impressive but impractical
- Galaxy S20 Ultra: Top camera features finally seem...
- Galaxy S20 Ultra: Our 5 favorite camera features,...
- Galaxy Fold successor surfaces on samsung support pages;...
- Samsung offers amazing offers and deals on Galaxy...
- Samsung Galaxy S11 to come in three sizes,...
- TCL to take on Galaxy Fold with innovative...